Showing posts with label edl tower hamlets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label edl tower hamlets. Show all posts

Wednesday, 24 August 2011

Unison sees fit to give its members money to Communists planning a riot


This is how Unison sees fit to spend its members money, financing a Marxist organisation who are trying to suppress free speech and are all out blatantly trying to provoke a riot in Tower Hamlets which they can then blame on the EDL. Are you still paying your subs?

Friday, 19 August 2011

British Patriots Society March London August 20th


British Patriots Society march London Saturday

19082011
An Invitation To Fellow Patriots

alt
Please join the British Patriots Society for an -
Anti-EU, Anti-Government Foreign Aid, and to demand that the MILITARY COVENANT be brought into LAW as promised by David Cameron!

1.30pm We will be assembling at OLD PALACE YARD, ABINGDON ST, OPPOSITE PARLIAMENT ANNEX.
alt



alt


2.00pm March : We will start the march here and pass through Whitehall, going past Downing Street through to Waterloo Place.
                         Demo Point
alt
Click the map for more details

Speeches
2.45pm - Welcome Speech – David Roocroft
2.50pm - Albert Burgess
3.01pm - Andrew Stott – United Peoples Party
3.12pm - Jacqui Janes – Make the Military Covenant Law as Promised by David Cameron
3.23pm- Cliff Dixon – English Democrats
3.34pm -  Kerry.J.Smith – UKIP
3.45pm - Pompey Dave – March for England
3.56pm - Closing Speech – David Roocroft
4.00pm- Finish
We look forward to your attendance.


Various Patriot groups & individuals will meet to voice our opinions on -
Why Britain should pull out of the E.U.!
Why Britain should STOP giving GOVERNMENT FOREIGN AID!

And Demand that the MILITARY COVENANT be brought into LAW as promised by David Cameron!

We request that Patriots would refrain from consuming alcohol until after the event/demo has finished & would appreciate your co-operation on this matter.
BPS Stewards will be in attendance on the day to assist the smooth running of the event.
If you have any disabilitiy or special needs please dont hesitate to contact us prior to the event and we will do our best to make sure you have a safe and pleasant day.
See the Patriots Event page - HERE
Please join our main facebook page -  HERE

Tower Hamlets EDL update


News


Theresa May
Theresa May: called on to ban EDL march through Tower Hamlets

Council tells May: Ban EDL march or face judicial review

Peter Dominiczak, City Hall Correspondent
19 Aug 2011 

Sponsored links







Tower Hamlets council is threatening to take the Government to court if it refuses to ban a march by far-Right group theEnglish Defence League.
Leaders are warning of violence if the event goes ahead on September 3 and will seek a judicial review if Home Secretary Theresa May does not ban it.
A council source said: "Something must be done to prevent this demonstration. If a judicial review is the only way then that is what we will do."
The EDL told members in an online message to take "our message into the heart of militant Islam within our own country". The message added: "We will go where we want, when we want."
Last week the Home Secretary banned an EDL march in Telford, Shropshire, saying she was acting to protect communities and property.
A Home Office spokesman said: "The Home Secretary can only ban a march in London following a formal application from the Commissioner of the Metropolitan police. No such application has been received. The Home Secretary will carefully consider any formal application, subject to the relevant legal tests."
Tower Hamlets Labour group leader Josh Peck said: "The EDL march should be banned. The police are more than capable of keeping them under control, but that won't stop the tension and anger that could exist long after they have left."

Friday, 12 August 2011

Never mind the looters, what about the "fascists"


Brendan O’Neill

Never mind the looters, what about the ‘fascists’?


The moral assaults on the Enfield ‘vigilantes’ confirm that the cultural elite fears the white working classes more than it does riotous youth.

We Brits may live in an era of extreme political flux and 24-hour rolling news, where the chattering classes are almost malarial in their feverish leaping from one issue to another, but there is at least one constant in modern political life: fear and loathing of the white working classes. However unpredictable the political realm becomes, however mercurial and consumed by spin our rulers allow themselves to get, we can always be sure that a) the sun will come up in the morning and b) people with names like Steve and Chantelle will be fingered as the cause of every social and moral problem.
And so it has been this week, which kicked off with reckless rioting by multi-ethnic yoof in inner-city patches, yet which ended, bizarrely but at the same time predictably, with an orgy of elite handwringing about those non-rioting white working classes who haunt London’s suburbs. That some of ‘these people’ dared to patrol their streets, to set up miniature citizen armies to see off the chancers and tricksters of the looting lobby, has been treated as the No.1 threat now facing Britain. They are a ‘white mob’, we are told, who could precipitate a ‘race war’. According to the deputy mayor of London, Kit Malthouse, their community-protection antics are ‘deeply undesirable’. Come on Kit, you can say it: you think these people are ‘undesirables’.
This riotous week has confirmed that the great and the good of Great Britain don’t have much in the way of a shared morality anymore. At the start of the week, the political class, cops and Fourth Estate all proffered various explanations for the youthful violence, often pointing the finger of blame at each other in a moral stand-off not dissimilar to the final scene in Reservoir Dogs. Yet by Friday they were tentatively re-linking arms around the one thing they agree on: that there is nothing scarier - nothing - than the sight of 100+ white blokes on the streets, shouting things in those gruff voices they have. You may have looked at the groups of men in Enfield and Eltham and seen working people keen to protect their homes and shops, but the upper echelons of society, through their snob-goggles, saw the emergence of an English version of the Third Reich – they saw ‘race hate’ and ‘fascists patrolling the streets’.
The Metropolitan Police now seem to be devoting as much energy to issuing warnings to the ‘white mob’ to lay down their baseball bats and go back to their Mock Tudor houses as they are to analysing their own fantastic failure to get a handle on the riots. This ‘vigilantism’, as a Met spokesman called it, ‘needs to stop’. ‘These so-called vigilantes, who appeared to have been drinking too much, are taking police resources away from [preventing the looting]’, says the Met. Confirming that the powers-that-be believe that white people of a more common persuasion are just one YouTube video away from turning into goose-stepping race warriors, a senior Met commissioner said far-right groups could ‘hijack’ the ‘vigilante movement’, threatening to give rise to what one journalist(who presumably had also been drinking too much) described as ‘anarchy in the UK’ with ‘fascists on the the streets’.
Note to the cultural elite: Just because someone is white and possibly a labourer and not currently glued to the American remake of The Killing, that doesn’t mean he is a fascist. The police’s PR assault on the ‘vigilantes’ in Enfield and Eltham, suburbs with large white working-class communities, shows that what the cops lack in riot-tackling skills they more than make up for with shamelessness. This is a force so paralysed by risk-aversion, so witlessly scared of provoking controversy, that this week it effectively stood back and allowed young people to loot shops, burn cars and destroy homes. It seems that in the morally inverted world of the modern police, such destruction is a price worth paying if it means their own officers don’t get a graze or PTSD. Upon what moral authority is the Met now telling working people not to patrol their communities? Cops bussed into a suburb might consider it acceptable to allow youth to smash things up in the hope that they’ll eventually tire, but for the people who live in those suburbs, who have a moral, emotional and economic attachment to them, that really isn’t an option. It takes brazenness to a brand new level for a state which failed to police the streets to libel those citizens who decided to do it for themselves.
Meanwhile in the media, the double standards exercised in relation to anti-riot citizen groups have been so explicit that it even seems weird to point them out. Where the white middle-class inhabitants of Clapham who took part in a ‘Riot Clean-Up’ were hailed as heroes, alongside the Turkish men who stood guard outside their restaurants and the Sikhs who wielded baseball bats in protection of their temples, the white working classes in Enfield and Eltham who displayed an equally vigorous determination to protect their communities have been described as fodder for ‘fascists’, a ‘mob’ – in a nutshell: scum. As one Guardian columnist put it, we of course all admire the Turks and Sikhs, but ‘when it’s a large group of Millwall supporters, in a pub all day, talking about doing the police’s job for them, it creates the impression that they’re spoiling for a fight… using the chaos to bust into a racial confrontation’.
Now as it happens, I also have great admiration for the self-styled Mrs Mops who cleaned up Clapham and for the Turks and Sikhs who with appropriate menace stood guard outside their business and religious institutions. In the absence of any top-down morality or even basic provision of security, these people took it upon themselves to police their communities, and they did a far better job of it than the police. But I also recognise that the idea that the community-protection schemes in Enfield and Eltham were fundamentally different, not so much Blitz-spirited as Nazi-inspired, is based on nothing but twisted prejudices towards white working-class communities.

Thursday, 11 August 2011

Speaking of looters......


Charity director who fraudulently claimed £31,000 in benefits walks free from court and won't repay a penny

Last updated at 11:57 AM on 11th August 2011
Charity director: Memory Mafuta with pictures of the medical aid waiting to be shipped to Zimbabwe last year
Charity director: Memory Mafuta with pictures of the medical aid waiting to be shipped to Zimbabwe last year
The director of an African aid charity, who fraudulently pocketed more than £30,000 of benefits, escaped jail when a judge ruled ‘taxpayers would not benefit’ from her being behind bars. 
Memory Mafuta, 39, of Westcliff, Essex, set up Orphanage Care Support Unit, which offers help and support to children in Africa whose parents have died from AIDS.
But despite her seemingly respectable standing, the Zimbabwe-born fraudster pocketed £31,000 in housing and council tax benefits by claiming to live alone and not be in work.
Her fraudulent behaviour was spotted when Southend Council's fraud team discovered she had applied for several credit cards in her name, stating her earned £40,000 a year and lived with a partner. 
It also emerged she had been employed as a care worker after applying for jobs using faked national insurance numbers. 
The scam went on for seven years before Mafuta was finally caught out.
 
Investigations revealed that at one stage she had £14,000 of savings but the court heard the money has now been spent. 
Amazingly Mafuta, who does not speak English, will not have to hand back a penny of her illegal gains because she is now penniless, the court was told.
Recorder Tim Clark, at Basildon Crown Court (pictured), said: 'Taxpayers in this country will not benefit from me sending you to prison'
At court: Recorder Tim Clark, at Basildon Crown Court (pictured), said: 'Taxpayers in this country will not benefit from me sending you to prison'
The mother-of-three pleaded guilty to nine counts of benefit fraud between 2003 and 2010, but avoided jail and was instead handed a nine-month suspended sentence.
Recorder Tim Clark, at Basildon Crown Court, said: ‘Taxpayers in this country will not benefit from me sending you to prison.
‘Benefits in this country are provided to the weakest and most vulnerable.
‘There has to be honesty from those who apply for benefits - honesty about their earnings, their family circumstances and their savings.’ 
In total Mafuta illegally received £31,072.
Recorder Clark said Mafuta's previous good character and dealings with charity had worked in her favour.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2024450/Charity-director-fraudulently-claimed-31-000-benefits-walks-free-court-wont-repay-penny.html#ixzz1UkRAE8Qg